Skip navigation
No more
Know more

Cars are just so 2004. Get with the times

For several years now, Americans have been driving less, a trend that started before the financial crisis and has continued even as the economy recovered. After decades in which distance traveled by car per capita in the United States increased reliably year after year, the decline is good news. People who live where there is less traffic tend to be healthier. They are more physically active, they breathe cleaner air, and, of course, they’re less likely to be injured in an automobile collision. Cars are also a major source of carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to global warming. Fortunately, the amount of gasoline burned per person in this country has fallen sharply, as shown in the graph above by Michael Sivak of the University of Michigan.

Part of this decline in fuel consumption is simply due to the fact that cars are becoming more efficient. Higher fuel-economy standards are among the Obama administration’s signature environmental policies, and high gas prices and the sluggish economy have led drivers to buy leaner cars.

More simply, though, people are burning less fuel because they are spending less time on the road. While the total number of vehicles and the total mileage traveled in the country have begun to increase slightly again, the population is growing, and the averages per person are declining. People are putting more miles on each car, but that seems to be because they have fewer vehicles and may be sharing them with family or colleagues.

There are many explanations for the decline in mileage per person. Older people are driving less as they retire, and younger people are driving less, too, which Richard Florida thinks is because having a car just isn’t cool anymore.

In any event, federal and local policymakers are going to have to do a better job of anticipating people’s changing driving habits. In the past, they’ve predicted that historical trends in driving would continue, a mistake that turned the government’s efforts to promote ethanol into a regulatory headache. Also, bad forecasts can encourage transportation departments to invest in roads and highways, but if the past few years are any indication, investment in public transit infrastructure is needed more urgently. As Fitch warned recently, reduced traffic will mean that agencies depending on tollbooths to help pay for new construction will have to deal with skepticism on Wall Street when they need a loan. Projects that rely on bus and train fares, by contrast, might look more appealing to bankers.

Max Ehrenfreund | April 1, 2014 at 12:00 pm
Know more: Has motorization in the United States peaked?
No more
Know more
What California would look like if the world’s ice sheets melt
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
The most searched comfort foods last winter, mapped
Ana Swanson
ADVERTISEMENT
No more
Know more
A lot of Americans think that Islam is at odds with their values
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
The American cities that are growing the fastest, mapped in 3D
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
The states that eat the most fruits and veggies
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
How State Department allowances vary around the world
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
The states where more babies are born prematurely
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
What the Republican candidates would have earned in minimum wage when they were teens
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
Fantastical designs from the frontier of subway maps
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
Popular movies, reduced solely to their colors
Ana Swanson
No more
Know more
Why CEOs are more susceptible to automation than landscapers
Ana Swanson